Cosmic Structure Formation
Outline
-
COBE-DMR and CMBR Anisotropies
-
Cosmic Seeds and the Face of God
-
Cosmic Seeds and Galaxies
Observed Cosmic Structure in the CMBR
-
small inhomogeneities are observed in the CMBR from COBE:
-
anisotropy level is
~ 10-5
-
and other smaller angular scale experiments such as HACME
(from UCSB):
-
anisotropy level is also
~ 10-5
-
or Saskatoon (Princeton & Penn):
-
anisotropy level is also
~ 10-5
-
It is expected that the full sky looks something like:
-
At higher angular resolution than COBE-DMR's 7 degrees:
Observed Structure in the Galaxy Distribution
-
The "Great Wall" is the passing horizontally through these
CfA "slice of the Universe" maps
-
Above is the map of a slice 6 degrees thick, and below is
the combination of 6 such slices
-
The radius of these slices is 15,000 km/sec or
z = 0.05
-
with a Hubble constant of H0 = 70 km/sec Mpc-1,
this is 210 Mpc = 700 million light years
-
Note the "fingers of God" pointing at us at the vertex of
the slice
-
These are artifacts of using Hubble's law to get distances
-
galaxies have "peculiar" velocities due to the gravitational
forces from nearby galaxies
-
these peculiar velocities become very large (> 1,000 km/sec)
in dense clusters of galaxies
-
so, large peculiar velocities lead to distance errors which
spread the clusters out along the line of sight.
-
Note that the typical size of the structures (or voids) is
5,000 km/sec or z = 0.017
-
or 70 Mpc = 230 million light years
-
This is close to the full size of the survey!
-
More recent surveys cover larger volumes of space
-
Here's the Las Campanas Redshift Survey double "pie diagram"
-
This is 4 times larger than the CfA survey at 60,000 km/sec
or z = 0.20
-
or 860 Mpc = 2.8 billion light years
-
note that the largest structures are still at 5,000 km/sec
or 70 Mpc
-
The 2dF Survey goes to the same distance, but plans to get
250,000 galaxies all over the Southern sky
-
The Sloan survey in the north plans to get 1,000,000 galaxies
-
the big difficulty is to get all those redshifts
-
the CfA survey does them 1 at a time, but Sloan and 2dF do
100's at a time with lots of fiber optics cables
-
Here is a photo of
their monster spectrograph on the AAT 4m telescope
-
Here is a photo of
the spectrograph "plate" which is supposed to have optical fibers for 400
spectra at once
-
Here are some basic facts about the distribution of galaxies
at present:
-
the connection between galaxies and the underlying mass distribution
is uncertain
-
the mass of galaxies is dominated by dark matter - not stars
-
galaxies may be more clustered than stars
-
this is called "biasing"
-
for now, we'll ignore this possibility
-
it is likely to be only a factor between 1 and 2
-
the distribution of mass is characterized by the mass density:

-
the mass density fluctuations are referred to by

-
on a scale of about 8 Mpc,
= 1
-
it is larger on small scales and smaller on large scales
-
on scales above about 100 Mpc (330 million light years)
drops sharply
-
This is why the galaxy distribution plots look smooth this
scale and larger.
The Growth of Cosmic Structure
-
How does
at last scattering relate to
today?
-
Recall that in the standard picture
is related to
at last scattering:
-
Here's a space-time diagram that is supposed to show how
this works:
-
This plot uses "co-moving" coordinates - the coordinates
move with the expansion
-
is the gravitational
potential that is proportional to - 
-
We're at the top vertex and the red
lines are our past lightcone
-
we see the CMBR anisotropy only where the red
lines intersect the "last scattering surface" which is the shaded
region on the bottom
-
positive
=> higher density => higher T => positive 
-
positive
=> stronger gravity => negative 
-
due to gravitational redshift
-
these 2 effects tend to cancel, but the redshift is stronger
-
positive
regions have negative 
-
because of the rough approximate cancellation (and other
factors), we have
-
~ -10
so
-
at last scattering
~ 10-5 =>
~ 10-4
-
on 8 Mpc scale
~ 1 today
-
we need something like a factor of 104 in growth
-
Recall that density perturbations grow due to gravity:
-
Here are the trajectories of individual particles move in
the same kind of space-time diagram:
-
The fluctuations in the density grow with time
-
dense regions tend to collapse and become denser
-
with respect to the average of the Universe
-
only in the final stages does the collapse overcome the overall
expansion
-
sparse regions don't slow their expansion as much as regions
of average density so they appear to grow sparser
-
When can density perturbations ,
,
grow?
-
The Universe must be matter dominated
-
radiation moves to fast to escape from any perturbation (unless
a black hole is forming)
-
When the Universe is matter dominated (after z = 30,000 or
so)
-
density perturbations in ordinary matter grow like
-
~ a(t) ~ 1/(1+z) like the scale factor of the Universe
-
when the universe expands by a factor of 10, a(t) and
both grow by a factor of 10.
-
density perturbations can only grow on scales that are "inside
the horizon"
-
this means scales < ct or so
-
due to the Universal speed limit, gravity can't really act
on larger scales than this
-
For baryonic matter (i.e. ordinary atoms), density perturbations
can't grow until the Universe is transparent.
-
before then, the radiation pressure pushes the atoms in the
opposite direction as gravity does
-
after last scattering, radiation and baryonic matter don't
interact.
-
This is a big problem:
-
since last scattering is at z ~ 1000,
can only grow to
~ 0.1 by today
-
with only baryons and a CMBR anisotropy of only
~ 10-5 , galaxies can never form!
-
The solution: Dark Matter
-
With dark matter,
starts growing when the density of dark matter becomes larger than the
radiation density: z = 30,000 or so
-
There is no problem to get a factor of 104 in
growth
-
At z = 30,000, the horizon scale is roughly 100 Mpc in comoving
coordinates
-
i.e. the horizon scale then will expand to be about 100 Mpc
now
-
this is why we see the lack of structure on larger scales
-
larger scales have less time to grow =>
is smaller on those scales
Where Did the Density Perturbations Come From?
-
They must be present at the horizon scale at z = 30,000
-
Did they exist at scales > ct at z > 30,000?
-
flucuations set up between regions that can't communicate?
-
inflationary theory says YES!
-
Or did some physical process set them up on large scales
at z = 30,000
-
It has to work at close to the speed of light
-
cosmic strongs are one example:
-
This gives a scenario slightly different than described above.
-
but
is still related to 