Big Bang Theory
Outline
-
Einstein's first attempt at a cosmological model
-
the Standard Big Bang Model
-
the Age of the Universe
Einstein's Attempt
-
Assume a homogeneous and isotropic Universe
-
Galaxies and clusters of galaxies are considered a small
correction to the overall structure of the Universe.
-
They're like little specs following the overall evolution
of the Universe
-
This is an approximation
-
assume no spatial boundary
-
Universe is infinite in space or closed like a sphere
-
Using these assumptions, Einstein tried to find a solution
-
He wanted a static solution - one that doesn't change
with time
-
but as you know, gravity sucks
-
that is, with ordinary matter, gravity is always an attractive
force
-
In Einstein's Theory
-
gravity sucks in space-time as well as ordinary matter
-
a static solution is not possible
-
contracting solutions are ok
-
expanding solutions are ok - as long as the expansion is
slowing down.
-
This was Einstein's big chance to predict the expansion
(or contraction) of the Universe
-
but he blew it!
-
he decided to fudge his equations instead!!
-
He took his beautiful field equation:

-
and changed it to :


-
adding the ugly "cosmological constant" term:

-
the
term describes the matter in the Universe
-
It is always positive for ordinary matter
-
the - sign in from of the
term means that
provides
a repulsive gravitational force
-
so gravity doesn't just suck any more
-
You don't need to remember the equations here - just remember
that the cosmological constant can provide a repulsive gravitational force.
-
With the Cosmological constant term,
,
it is possible to balance the attractive force due to ordinary matter with
the repulsive force of the cosmological constant
-
Einstein found his static model
-
The balance was unstable
-
like a pencil balanced on its point
-
an extremely tiny push will make it fall
-
remember that this is only an approximate model
-
the extra details will provide the push, and the model won't
be balanced
-
Einstein rejected the cosmological constant as an ugly fudge
factor when Hubble discovered the expansion of the Universe
-
In January 1998, two teams studying distant Supernovae announced
possible evidence for a cosmological constant!
-
But, now it's not thought of as a fudge factor
-
There's thought to be a really weird kind of matter that
gives a repulsive gravitational force!
The Standard Model
-
Developed by Friedmann and Lemaitre
-
Lemaitre was a Belgian priest motivated to find a cosmology
with a beginning of time - like Genesis!
-
For a mathematical description we need to a way to describe
how big the Universe is
-
but it could be infinite!
-
define a scale factor, a(t)
-
This describes the relative distance of two specs floating
along with the Universal expansion (or contraction)
-
t0 = now
-
for t < t0, a(t) < a(t0)
i.e. the Universe was smaller in the past
-
our two specs were closer together
-
Light waves also follow the expansion:
-
the cosmological redshift formula:
-
= (a(t)/a(t0))
0
-
You don't need to know this formula on the midterm, but we
will cover it later
-
Here's how the scale factor evolved with time in the Friedmann
model:
-
This is a plot of the scale factor as a function of time
-
now is given as t = 0.
-
the green line
shows a low density Universe
-
there's so little matter that gravity
can never stop the expansion
-
the Universe will expand forever
-
the Universe is like a projectile launched
at v > the escape velocity
-
space is negatively curved - like a
saddle (as shown below)
-
the red
line
shows a high matter density Universe
-
there's so much matter that gravity
will stop the expansion
-
the Universe will eventually collapse
in the Big Crunch
-
the Universe is like a projectile launched
at v < the escape velocity
-
space is positively curved (like a
sphere) and finite
-
the black line shows a critical
density Universe
-
there's just enough matter to stop
the expansion at t = infinity
-
the Universe will expand forever
-
the Universe is like a projectile launched
at v = the escape velocity
-
space is flat, but space-time is still
curved

Age of the Universe
-
The age of the Universe depends on how fast the Universe
is expanding now
-
This is described by Hubble's law:
-
where v = velocity and d = distance
-
H0 = Hubble's constant = 70±10 km/sec /Mpc
-
note that km and Mpc are both units of distance
-
we can also write H0 = 1/(15 billion years)
-
simple estimate for the age of the Universe
-
age = 1/H0 = 15 billion years
-
this is correct if the Universe expands at the same rate
-
i.e. H never changes - the empty
Universe case
-
but if the Universe is slowing down, then it must have expanded
faster in the past
-
so, it would be younger than 15 billion years
-
such as 10 billion years for the critical density Universe
-
or 8.5 billion years for the high
density Universe shown below.
-
But, we could have a cosmological constant:
-
The blue curve shows the evolution of the scale factor for
a Universe with a cosmological constant but no matter.
-
This is the blue
curve above.
-
In this case the expansion accelerates for all time
-
it will expand forever
-
it never had a beginning
-
With both a cosmological constant and matter
-
This is the magenta
curve above.
-
It starts like a critical or high density
Universe
-
the cosmological constant takes over
at late times
-
the age is larger than it would be
without the cosmological constant: 15 billion years above.
A Problem
-
consider the Universe at t = 1ns
-
If it has just the critical density
of matter, it will expand forever
-
If it has twice the critical density,
it will collapse within a few ns
-
If it has half the critical density,
it will become essentially empty in a few tens of ns.
-
It has to be very precisely tuned to
be very close to the critical density in order to
-
survive for 10 billion years
-
and to have enough matter to make galaxies
and stars
-
Why is the Universe like this?
-
we don't know
-
but the inflationary Universe model is one possible
answer.